Leaders cannot rest on their laurels and allow EU to be safe haven
for racism
By Bashy Quraishy
WHEN it comes to
fighting racism, the EU institutions have the tendency to congratulate
themselves on the job achieved. At ENAR, the European Network Against Racism,
we estimate that, on the contrary, the EU has abdicated its responsibilities in
the fight against racism Ð and ENAR denounces it for this course of action.
In the past, key dates have
marked the EUÕs genuine political commitment to combat racism and xenophobia
and highlighted the dynamic development of a coherent EU policy on these key
issues.
In 1995, the Commission
published a communication on racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism. In 1996, the
institutions adopted a joint action to combat racism and xenophobia. The EU
Monitoring Centre on Xenophobia and Racism (EUMC) was established in 1997
following the European Year Against Racism and in 1998 the action plan against
racism was adopted.
At the Tampere Summit in 1999, the European Council called
Òfor the fight against racism and xenophobia to be stepped upÓ and proposed in
2001 a framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia, tackling the
issue of racism as a crime. The same year, member states declared at the Laeken
Summit that Ôracism is on the riseÕ.
However, since then,
nothing has further materialized.
Civil society continues to
draw the attention of the general public and governments to the fact that
racism is on the rise. Racist and xenophobic crimes continue to be reported
daily. In fact, political parties openly developing a political programme based
on racist and xenophobic propaganda have even become members of a number of
government coalitions in Europe.
Paradoxically, this
evidence is totally ignored by European decision-makers who, since the 2001
Laeken Declaration, have steadily marginalized any EU action against racism on
their political agenda by no longer condemning racism in the European Council
presidency conclusions. Discussions in the Convention on the future of Europe,
about the EUÕs competence in justice and home affairs on combating racism and
xenophobia, have been extremely difficult.
We are witnessing a total
blockage in political negotiations regarding the proposed framework decision to
combat racist and xenophobic crime. The agendas of both the Irish and Dutch
presidencies do not plan any action on this or any major initiative against
racism in 2004.
Do European decision-makers
think there is no racism anymore? Or do they think they have done their job?
Indeed, the two equality
directives adopted in 2000 to fight discrimination are merely milestones in the
EUÕs policy to combat racism and are thus not an end-objective as such.
A lot still needs to be
done and the Council must assume its responsibilities to implement the Tampere
objective to step up the fight against this scourge.
Negotiations with a view to
adopting the framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia need to be
restarted.
Presidencies have the duty
to keep the item high on their political agenda.
The EUMC was one of the
major outcomes of the European Year Against Racism. It enhances the visibility
of the European commitment and produces valuable research and recommendations
for the development of both EU and national policies to fight racism and
xenophobia. However, the Council unexpectedly decided in December 2003 to
broaden the mandate of the EUMC to transform it into a general human rights
agency.
By changing the focus of
the EUMC, the issue of anti-racism has once again been marginalized. Safeguards
need to be given to preserve the resources, the focus and the visibility of the
centreÕs actions against racism.
At Tampere, member states
agreed that Ôpeople have the right to expect the Union to address the threat to
their freedom and legal rights posed by serious crimeÕ.
Racism is a serious crime
and the lack of action against it is shaping the EU as a safe haven for
racists. Is that what decision-makers really want?
á Bashy Quraishy is chairman of the European Network Against Racism, which comprises 600 NGOs.