1. Special Contribution by Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam, Chair UN CMW
2. News on the Migrant Workers Convention
3. International Platform (IPMWC)
1.
Special Contribution by Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam, Chair UN CMW
UN
Convention on the Protection of
Migrant Workers
By Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam
Chairperson
of the UN Committee on Migrant Workers
The
process of globalisation has transformed States, societies, economies and
cultures in all regions, making the world an increasingly integrated and
inter-dependent community. With
the advent of new technologies and the expansion of the global economy, new
opportunities are being created all the time for people in different parts of
the world. Nevertheless the impact
of globalisation has been uneven and growing disparities in living conditions
both within and between countries are becoming apparent. This has contributed to the increase in
the scale of international migration.
There are almost 200 million
international migrants today. This figure is more than double that was recorded
in 1980, just 25 years ago.
The
International Convention on the Protection of All Migrant Workers and Members
of their Families is the most comprehensive international treaty dealing with
rights of migrant workers. This Convention, popularly referred to as the
International Convention on Migrant Workers (ICMW) is also the latest of the
seven "core" international human rights treaties, which together form
the United Nations human rights treaty system. Most of the rights contained in six other "core"
treaties also apply to non-citizens and thus provide a basic protection for
migrant workers and their families against discrimination and other violations
of their fundamental human rights. The ICMW on the other hand codifies existing
standards in a forward looking and a progressive manner. It complements
internationally recognized labour standards, whilst specifying the application
of generally recognized human rights standards to migrant workers and their
families. The Convention protects
the human rights of migrant workers at all stages of the migration process, in
the country of origin, the country of transit and the country of employment, by
clarifying obligations of the States parties.
The
overarching principle of the Convention is non-discrimination. Article 1
affirms this at the outset, stating as follows:
“
The present Convention is applicable, except as otherwise provided hereafter,
to all migrant workers and members of their families without distinction of any
kind such as sex, race, colour, language, religion conviction, political or
other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, nationality, age, economic
position, property, marital status, birth or other status.”
Although the enumeration of such
grounds for distinction is illustrative and not exhaustive, it is important to
note that the list in the convention is broader than those found in other human
rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The
Migrant Workers Convention is very comprehensive and has taken into account the
emerging developments in the world.
However,
despite the intrinsically progressive nature of the Convention, ratification
remains far below expectations. Parties to the Convention are still
predominantly labour exporting States.
To date, none of the major labour receiving States in the Western
hemisphere are among the current 37 parties to the Convention. It is unfortunate that no Western State
has yet signed or ratified the Convention despite some of those States having actively participated in
drafting the Convention and none
having voted against the ICMW at the time of its adoption by consensus by the United Nations back in 1990.
As
to why the Convention has met with insufficient enthusiasm on the part of many
States, especially those States that usually champion human rights issues is an
important question. There has been
several interesting views on this matter.
One common misconception is the often
expressed opinion that the Convention favours irregular migration and granting
more rights to migrants would make a State more attractive to irregular
migrants. On the contrary, the
Convention obliges States parties to take measures to counter illegal
migration. The preamble and article 35 reflect these ideals. The concept of
giving rights to irregular migrant workers was inspired not only by the basic
principle of respect for the dignity of all human beings, but also by the
desire to discourage recourse by employers to irregular labour, by making such
recruitment much less
advantageous.
It
is also possible that the contents of some provisions of the ICMW may be
unacceptable to some States, because provision of some rights may be perceived
as beyond the economic and social capacity and imperatives of a particular
State. However, the Convention itself has foreseen this possibility and has
provided for entering reservations to the application of certain articles.
Therefore this obstacle can be overcome by a careful study of the compatibility
of the domestic legislation with the rights contained in the convention, and
the drafting of pertinent reservations, if necessary.
Many
States may also fear the high cost of developing infrastructure for the
implementation of the Convention. The Convention is a long and complex
instrument that provides many rights in different fields, and the
implementation therefore consequently involves many government departments,
coordination of which may not be an easy task. It is also possible that some
States may have only a small number of migrants and do not see a need to
legislate on this complex issue and for some others the Convention is not well
known and therefore not high on their political agenda. It also appears that
some States are not willing to let international agreements to interfere with
their domestic migration policy, viewing these policies as strictly national
issues.
It
is also becoming apparent that the present political climate is not very
conducive to granting of rights to migrant workers. Public opinion in many
receiving countries has turned against migrants who are perceived as competing
in and thus a danger to local job markets. Prejudices against migrants are also
aggravated by a trend to view foreigners as potential security risks. Moreover, family reunions recommended
in the Convention may run counter to policy of some receiving States to
diminish number of migrants and encourage only productive migrants. In these circumstances, some States may
feel that the ratification of the Convention and thus recognition of rights of
migrant workers, in particular irregular migrant workers within their borders
would meet with opposition of society at large, and exacerbate social tensions.
Some States may perceive that the State would be subject to an examination by
an international body leading to an embarrassing situation of human rights
violations highlighted at international level.
All
these fears lack credibility. It is a matter of political will and not resource
or social constraints that is holding back States on this account. This Convention is not an
instrument for a more liberal immigration policy. It does not propose new set of
rights specific to migrant workers.
The Convention only seeks to ensure that all human rights are accorded
to migrant workers too, in recognition that they are also part of our large
human family.
States that already respect human rights
and have ratified the other six core human rights instruments therefore have no
reason to resist ratifying the ICMW as they already are bound by the provisions
in those Conventions that apply to migrant workers.
The
economic benefits of migration for both sending and receiving countries are
increasingly becoming apparent. It has now been widely recognised that migrant
workers are actively contributing to the growth and economic prosperity in
receiving countries. The impact on
the job market by the presence of migrant workers in receiving countries is a
moot point. The World Economic and Social Review has recorded that in receiving countries, migrants only have a modest impact on
wages since the increase in the
supply of labour due to the arrival of migrant workers is off-set by demands
for goods and services and the setting up of new businesses. Moreover, some categories of jobs avoid
competition and low skilled jobs in the informal economy are mostly up for
grabs by migrant workers. In addition, sustained levels of migration have been
recorded as offsetting natural reduction of the working age population in many
receiving countries.
On the other hand, many countries of
origin in the developing world are benefiting immensely from inward remittances
by migrant workers. For many
developing countries such remittances have become main stays in financial
inflows, even surpassing ODA and revenue from traditional exports. While the
flight of skilled migrants
searching for work is denounced as a “brain drain” in sending countries, it has
also been observed that sending countries could benefit from the eventual
return of some, who have acquired
new skills, new money and therefore could
help transform
economies and institutions in their countries of origin.
By
taking into account all aspects relating to migrant workers; it is becoming
increasingly apparent that providing for human rights of the migrant workers is
a win-win situation, both in economic terms as well as for giving effect to
globally accepted human rights standards and values.
The
Convention is a comprehensive and a progressive instrument in terms of
protection of human rights of migrant workers and members of their
families. It has taken into
account all previous human rights norms applicable to migrant workers and
integrated them, bearing in mind the ongoing trends in the world, both in terms
of ever increasing mobility of people as well as the continuing emphasis on
human dignity and the human rights of the individual.
In
a world that is inter-dependent and that values the freedom, rights and dignity of the individual, it is
essential that the international
community, makes the International Convention on Migrant Workers, a universal
instrument, so that all migrant workers are treated as human beings with equal
rights, wherever they live and wherever they come form.
Status of
the Convention
There are
now 37 States Parties to the Migrant Workers Convention: Albania ratified the Convention on 5
June 2007.
For more
information about the Convention (including updated list of ratifications and
signatures) and NGO campaigns, please click here.
Committee
on Migrant Workers
The seventh session of the UN Committee
on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their
Families (UN CMW) just took place in Geneva,
Switzerland, from 26 to 30 November 2007. The committee adopted concluding
observations on Ecuador,
after examination of the State’s
replies to the list
of issues, and after
hearing NGOs’ additional
information. The
Committee also started the examination of the reports from Syria
and Bolivia
and adopted lists of issues on both countries.
On 6 December 2007, 5 out of the 10 members of the
Committee will be elected by the States Parties in New York. To see the new
members, visit this page.
In April 2008, the Committee will meet for two weeks
for an annual meeting (from 14 to 25 April). It will start the examination of
reports from El Salvador, Azerbaijan and Bosnia & Herzegovina and
will adopt lists of issues on these countries. It will also hold a Day of Celebration of the Convention on
the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the entry into force of the Migrant
Workers’ Convention.
If you would like to submit information to the
Committee on Migrant Workers on the following countries, Syria, Bolivia, El
Salvador and Azerbaijan, please contact the Secretariat of the Committee, Ms.
Carla Edelenbos, at CMW@ohchr.org.
You can also consult the web page of the International NGO Platform
on the Migrant Workers’ Convention to find more info on the way to submit
information to the CMW.
3. International Platform (IPMWC)
The IPMWC participated in the Global Community Forum,
the NGO event parallel to the Global Forum on Migration and Development that
took place in Brussels from 9 to 11 July 2007. A report of this civil society
Day will be published soon that includes important decisions for future Global
Fora on Migration and Development; in particular, the Global Community Forum
led to the creation of a coalition of NGOs to prepare the next Forum in Manila
in 2008. Though it was not among
the 200 organisations invited to take part in the official Civil Society Event
on 9 July, the IPMWC also circulated a letter that
was addressed to Mme. Régine De Clercq from the Belgian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and to Mr. Luc Tayart de Borms, from the King Baudouin Foundation. In this letter, the Platform expressed
its concerns regarding the organisation of the Global Forum vis-à-vis civil
society actors, and advocated for the respect of the international protection
regime and the ratification of the Migrant Workers’ Convention.
The IPMWC held its ninth meeting in
preparation of the CMW session on 22 November 2007. You can consult the draft
minutes of this meeting by clicking here.
Information on the IPMWC and minutes
of former meetings can be found on December 18 website (click here)
or by contacting the IPMWC coordinator at ipmwc@december18.net.
4. UN News
The Human
Rights Council has adopted the modalities for the Universal Periodic Review;
this review will start in 2008. The calendar of the full cycle of universal
review can be found here.
At its next session, from 7 to 18 April 2008, the Council will review the human
rights fulfilments by 16 States.
The Council
also has 14 new members,
elected in May 2007.
Please send us your
information on the activities you are planning for this year’s celebration of
International Migrants’ Day. They will be included in our international
calendar.
As usual, we will also
publish your IMD press releases and statements on our web site. So please send
them to us by writing to rene@december18.net
To access the calendar click
on the link: www.radio1812.net/event
There are now over 50 radios in 24 countries that have committed to taking part in Radio 1812/2007 to celebrate International Migrants Day, and we are welcoming more ever day! We are absolutely delighted to welcome new and old participants in this year's events.
For more information on
how to take part in Radio 1812 or to share any existing audio content you may
have on migration, please check the Radio 1812 website at: www.radio1812.net, or contact us at: radio1812@december18.net
December 18 is an NGO in special consultative status
with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.
Our offices are located at:
164 rue Gaucheret rue
de Varembé
1030 Brussels CH-1211
Geneva 20
Belgium Switzerland
Tel : +32-2-2741435 Tel :
+41-22-9191042
Fax : +32-2-2741438 Fax:
+41-22-9191048
Published by December 18 vzw
Editors: Marie d’Auchamp and René Plaetevoet
Contact: info@december18.net
The Spanish, Italian, and French versions are
available upon request.
Spanish version translated by Isabel Miranda
French version translated by Aude Guimont
Italian version translated by Eny Giambastiani