|
EUROPEAN
COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES CONSEIL EUROPEEN SUR LES REFUGIES ET
LES EXILES EU.OFFICE |
SCOPE of the Proposal for a
Council Directive laying down minimum standards on the reception of applicants
for asylum in Member States
Background
ECRE urges MS
to provide the same reception conditions from the moment that an asylum claim
is received throughout the period during which the application and any appeals
are examined, until a final decision has been made. The proposal should apply
to all asylum seekers, including those whose applications are being processed
under admissibility and accelerated procedures. Where another State is deemed
to be responsible for the examination of the asylum application, under the
Dublin Convention or another such treaty or readmission agreement, the period
of reception extends until the moment of departure to that State.
During this
time certain material provisions should be made available to each individual
asylum seeker or asylum seeking family; this is the concern and responsibility
of the receiving State.
ECRE believes
that adequate conditions of reception are essential to the functioning of a
fair and efficient asylum procedure. To enable an asylum seeker to be
physically and mentally equipped to deal with the asylum interview process,
reception must embrace more than just non-refoulement and the supply of most
basic needs. It must ensure the independence and personal dignity of each
asylum seekers.
Applications at the border
The standard
of reception should not be dependent upon the time or place that the asylum claim
is lodged. In other words, there should be no discrimination against asylum
seekers who do not apply at the border or at the earliest opportunity, as there
are often valid reasons for delayed or “in-country” applications.
Dublin Convention, re admission, admissibility and
accelerated procedures
Asylum seekers whose applications
are processed under the Dublin Convention, or are considered to be manifestly
unfounded, or otherwise undeserving of a thorough examination in the normal
asylum procedure, nevertheless require a standard of reception which fully
respects their human rights as persons within the jurisdiction of the receiving
State and which does not in any way obstruct or deter them from pursuing their
case, or from appealing against negative decisions.
Socio-economic
context
As a general
rule, standards of reception should reflect the context of the host
country’s society and economy, while always respecting the asylum
seeker’s human rights.
In European countries where there is
not a developed welfare system, or only very limited provisions, the
international community should nevertheless explore ways to finance the
assistance of asylum seekers. Such international financial assistance would be
justified on the grounds that asylum seekers usually do not have the same
extended family networks to support them as the local population, are likely to
suffer discrimination, may lack the language proficiency necessary to gain
employment, and are often particularly vulnerable as a result of traumatic experiences,
uprooting and/or medical conditions. ECRE refers to its support for the
establishment of the European Refugee Fund as a gesture of responsibility
sharing. ECRE believes that
the European Refugee Fund has a key role in the implementation of European
Union wide minimum standards of reception provision and will be monitoring its
effectiveness.
Reception
facilities at borders
Asylum seekers
who lodge their applications at border points and are accommodated in
facilities at such points should be provided with all necessary assistance,
including access to legal representation and medical services. If such
facilities only provide basic necessities, such as food and shelter, no asylum
seeker should be forced to remain there for a prolonged period but should
instead be moved to a reception facility more fully equipped with other
amenities.
ECRE maintains
that the reception of asylum seekers in ‘closed’ facilities at many
European border points amounts to detention. It should be avoided and, where
resorted to in exceptional cases, covered by the same legal safeguards as other
forms of deprivation of liberty in the host state.
Chapter III
Material Reception Conditions
Article 15 - General Rules
Article 15(1)
ECRE welcomes the granting of material reception
conditions to applicants of asylum during all forms of procedures. We fully endorse the
arguments for a rights-based approach as put forward by the Commission in its
explanatory memorandum and in paragraph 2 of Article 15. We note, however, with
concern that reception conditions may end as soon as a negative (first or
second instance) decision has been notified to the
applicant. This might leave a gap in the provision of reception conditions in
three scenarios: from the moment of notification of a negative decision until
the applicant lodges an appeal; or until a decision to have an unsuccessful
applicant removed from the territory is enforced; or the applicant leaves the
territory voluntarily. We note that in the latter two cases, the person
concerned ceases to be an applicant for asylum and falls outside the scope of
the Directive under normal rules. However, we emphasise that as long as an
applicant still holds a right to appeal against a negative decision, s/he
remains an ‘applicant for asylum’ and therefore, should benefit
from all the provisions of the Directive. Furthermore ECRE position is that “Applicants for asylum shall be
allowed to remain on the territory of the Member State in which the application for asylum has been made
or is being examined for as long as a final decision has not been taken.”
We therefore ask Member States to guarantee the provision of all
material reception conditions until a final decision, i.e. a decision in
respect of which all possible remedies under the Directive on Asylum Procedures
have been exhausted, is taken on the application.
To this end, we suggest re-drafting Article 15(1)(a) as follows:
"Member States shall ensure that material reception conditions
are available to applicants and their accompanying family members throughout
the regular, admissibility and accelerated procedures up to the moment a final
decision is notified. A final
decision is a decision in respect of which all possible remedies under Council Directive
…/…/EC on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for
granting and withdrawing refugee status have been exhausted.”